Social Position and Distributive Justice:
Experimental Evidence
 

(co-authors Kurtis Swope, John Cadigan, and Robert Shupp)

Abstract

In a simple double-blind dictator experiment, systematically removing subjects’ levels of power and entitlement increases their choice of an income distribution generally consistent with Rawls (1971) concept of distributive justice, although choices are less unanimous and risk-averse than hypothesized.

Keywords:  Power; entitlement; justice; experimentsy

JEL classification:  C91;  D31