Next: Exercises for Chapter 2
Up: Some consequences of the
Previous: Some consequences of the
  Contents
  Index
Property 1
Generalized associative law: We shall not give a careful
formulation of this property nor shall we prove
it (the interested reader can consult [
Sc], p. 3, 4).
This property essentially means that parentheses can be
inserted or deleted at will (just as long as the order
is not changed) without affecting the value of a product
involving any number of group elements; e.g., if

,

a group, then

, etc.
Property 2
Uniqueness of the identity element: We claim that the
element

of condition 2 of Definition
2.1.2 is unique.
Proof: For suppose that
is also an identity of
; i.e.,
for all
. Then
, but on the other hand
, since
is an identity element. Consequently,
.
Property 3
Uniqueness of the inverse element: We claim that for each
element

in

the element

of condition 3 of
Definition
2.1.2 is unique.
Proof: Namely, suppose
and
.
Then
.
For each
we call this unique element
.
Property 4
If

and

are elements of a group

, then there exist unique
elements

and

of

such that

and

.
Proof: If
, then multiplying both sides on the right by
,
yields
or that
.
Conversely, if
, then
.
Hence, the equation
has the unique
solution
. Similarly, one shows that the equation
has the unique solution
.
Property 5
Alternate group definition (A): If

is a semi-group in
which the equations

and

are solvable
for arbitrary

, then

is a group.
Proof: Let
be a solution of the equation
.
Thus
. Moreover, for any
, there exists an
element
such that
. Now
.
This shows that there exists an element
such that
for any
.
Now, analogously,
consider the equation
and let
be a solution so
that
. Then for any
there exists an
such that
;
thus
, and we have
shown that there exists an element
such that
for any
. Thus, we have
so
, and consequently
contains an identity element.
Now it follows from the hypothesis, that there exist
such that
and
.
Hence,
,
so
.
This shows
that the given statement is sufficient for
being a group.
The fact that it is also necessary is a consequence
of Property 4 of our elementary group properties.
Proof: Multiply both sides of (a) by
on the left; (b)
is done similarly.
We note that as a consequence of the cancellation laws, if
we write the Cayley table for
there will be
no duplications in any row or column. As a matter of fact,
this property of groups is quite useful to keep in
mind when constructing the table in the first place. (See also
Exercise 8 for this chapter.)
Property 7
Alternate finite group definition: A finite semi-group
(i.e., a semi-group with a finite number of elements)
in which the cancellation laws hold is a group.
Proof: Clearly this property is necessary for being a group
from property 6. Now suppose that
is a finite
semi-group satisfying the cancellation
laws (see Property 6).
Let
be an arbitrary element of
.
The
elements
are then all
distinct by the left
cancellation law. Hence, if
is an arbitrary element
of
, then there exists an
such that
, i.e., the
equation
is solvable. Similarly, the equation
is
solvable in
, and therefore, by Property 5,
is a group.
Property 8
Alternate group definition (B): If

is a semi-group which
has at least one element

such that

for
all

(such an element is called a
right identity),
and, if among all such elements

, there is an element

such that to each

there exists an element

such that

(such an element is called a
right inverse), then

is a group.
Proof: If
is a group, it is clear that these conditions
are satisfied. Now suppose
is a semi-group
satisfying our conditions. Let
. Then
.
Now there exists an
such that
.
Thus,
, or
, so
since
is a right identity.
Thus
is an identity, i.e.,
for all
. Thus if
is a group then
is the unique identity element. To prove that
is a group, let
. Then
Hence
is the unique identity and
is the
unique inverse of
.
Property 9
Laws of exponents: By (1), we know that we can
unambiguously write

where all the

,

a group.
If all the

, one writes this expression as

and speaks of the

power of

. (Note:

may
not be a number. So even though

and

it may be that

, e.g., if

.)
Negative powers of

can be defined as follows:
(Note: If we just defined

,
then it can be proven by
induction on

that

for all

.)
Finally, one defines

. It is then not hard to show that
for m,n arbitrary integers, the following laws of
exponents hold in

:
 |
(2.2) |
 |
(2.3) |
In the case of an abelian group
written with the binary
operation
, for
and
, one writes
instead of
,
(
times),
and
. The laws
corresponding to (2.2) and (2.3)
become for abelian groups
where
.
Definition 2.2.1
Consider now an element

, a group.
If all the powers,

(

), of the element are distinct,
then

is called an element of
infinite order in

.
Let us suppose that this is not the case. So there
exist
, where
, say
, such that
. Then
where
. In other words, if
is not an element
of infinite order, then there exist positive integers
such that
.
Definition 2.2.2
Let

be a group and

.
Let

be the smallest positive integer,
if it exists, such that

then

is
called the
order of

and we shall write

.
One also says that

is of
finite order with order

.
If
, then all the elements
 |
(2.4) |
are distinct. For just as above, if any were equal
we would get
for
in contradiction to the definition
of
. Moreover, we also contend that any power
is equal
to one of the elements in (2.4). For the Division
Algorithm gives that
,
. Then
by the laws of exponents. In addition, we see from this same
relationship that if
, and
, then
. Indeed,
,
, and
is the smallest positive
integer such that
, we must have
. Thus
.
In summary, we have our last elementary property.
Property 10
If

is a group,

, and

,
then

are distinct, any power of

is equal to one of these, and finally

if and
only if

.
We have seen (Example 2.1.12) that there exist infinite groups
all of whose elements have finite orders; such
groups are called periodic. In any group,
, the identity
,
of course, has finite order
. If this is the only
element of
with finite order, then
is called
torsion free.
We conclude this chapter with an important definition, viz.,
the notion of a subgroup of a group
. We
shall make use of this concept throughout the text.
Notation: We write
when
is a subgroup of
.
It is clear that a subgroup
of a group
is itself a group
with respect to the same binary operation given
on
. The definition can be given in a more succinct fashion,
but we refer the reader to the exercises for this
and related matters. We now list a few examples of subgroups
of some of the groups given earlier in this
chapter. Many more examples of subgroups will be encountered
in the course of our investigations.
Example 2.2.4
Let

(Example
2.1.9) with binary operation
to be addition of rationals and let

.
Clearly

.

Example 2.2.5
Let

be the group of Example
2.1.13
and take

. Then

. (

is called the
special linear group,
denoted

.)

Example 2.2.6
Take

(Example
2.1.14) and

to be those

-tuples for which the first entry is

. Then

.

Next: Exercises for Chapter 2
Up: Some consequences of the
Previous: Some consequences of the
  Contents
  Index
David Joyner
2001-04-12