We return again to the general case where is
an arbitrary group. Let be an arbitrary nonempty subset
of , and
;
such a set is usually called
a complex of .
If and are two complexes of ,
the product is defined as follows:
If , a singleton set, we shall write
instead of .
(A similar notation will be followed if is
a singleton set.) It is clear, by the associative law,
that if , , and are complexes of , then
Finally if is a complex of , we denote by
the following set
Using the notation just introduced, we can characterize,
according to exercise 2 of Chapter 2, a subgroup
as follows: a nonempty subset of a group is a subgroup
if and only if
(4.4)
It is also clear that if
, then , and .
Next suppose that and .
Assume that .
If and , then
and
,
therefore
.
But since is assumed itself to be a subgroup, it
must contain which is the general element of
, i.e.,
we have shown that
.
Similarly,to show that
,
we need to show that a general element
of is in fact in .
Since
, we have
,
where , . This implies
, so
. Together, these imply
.
Conversely, suppose that
.
Then
,
hence
from the characterization of subgroups given in
(4.4).
We, therefore, have established the following result.
Theorem 4.2.1
The product of two subgroups ,
of a group is itself a subgroup if and only if and
commute, i.e., if and only if
.
Warning: We caution the reader that when we
say and commute, we do not demand that this
is so elementwise. In other words, it is not demanded that
for all and all
; all that we demand is that for any
and , for some elements
and .
For example, in , if
and
then as the reader can verify
and , so that
. But note that
whereas
.
Subsections