Next: Exercises
Up: Homomorphisms
Previous: Homomorphisms
  Contents
  Index
Definition and Elementary Properties
We return to a consideration of mappings from one
group to another.
Definition 7.1.1
Let

and

be two groups
(both denoted multiplicatively) and let

. The
mapping

is called a
homomorphism
if

for all

. If

is an
onto homomorphism, i.e.,
![$G_2 = f[G_1]$](img1508.gif)
, then

is called a
homomorphic image of

.
In words, a homomorphism is just a map from one group
to another which preserves the operation. Let
us consider two examples of homomorphisms: the
first rather general, the second quite specific.
Example 7.1.2
Let

be a group and

.
Consider the canonical (or natural) mapping

of

onto

given by

for all

.

is clearly onto

, and
Thus

is a homomorphic image of

.
This example shows that a factor group of a group is always a
homomorphic image of the group.

Example 7.1.3
Let

, as in Example
2.1.14.
Map

to itself by
where

.
It is easy to see that

is a homomorphism
of

into itself (see exercise 1 for this section).

We now consider some general properties of homomorphisms.
Proof:
Let
be the identity of
. We have
, so
.
Let
.
Then
. But
which implies by cancellation that
is the identity element of
. Finally,
, so
. This shows
that
by Definition 2.2.3.
Let us remark that in the above proof we showed
two other important properties of a homomorphism.
They are:
, where
is the identity of
(
),
-
, for every
.
Definition 7.1.5
Let

be a homomorphism, and let

designate
the identity of

as well as of

.
Let

.
The set

is called
the
kernel of

. We write

.
We shall presently show that if
is a homomorphism then
, but first we note the
following basic property.
Proof:
If
is 1-1, since
,
can be the only
element which maps to
, i.e.,
.
Conversely, if
, then if
, we
have
since
. Thus
.
So
, and
.
Proof:
We have already seen that
.
If
, then
and
, so
;
hence
. Also
, i.e.,
if
, then
. We have so far
shown that
.
To see that it is normal, suppose
and
. Then
. Therefore
implies
that
. This says
for all
.
This is sufficient to show
,
according to Proposition 6.1.4.
In the case of the canonical map
(see Example 7.1.2),
(the identity
element of
) if and only if
if and only if
. Thus
.
We observe (see exercise 2 for this section) that
if
are groups and if
and
are homomorphisms then
is a homomorphism.
Suppose again that
is a homomorphism with
.
We observed, for general mappings in section 1.1
that there is associated with
a factorization
such that
,
is onto,
is 1-1 and onto, while
is an injection mapping.
Also recall that was a set of
equivalence classes, determined by the equivalence
relation:
if and only if
.
Consider the equivalence class of
, namely
. Now
if and only if
if and only if
if and only if
if and only if
if and only if
.
Thus
and
is precisely
and
is the canonical homomorphism.
Thus we have
Now
, being an injection mapping, is an isomorphism
of
into
. Finally we claim that
is an
isomorphism of
onto
. We know, in general
that
is 1-1 and onto, thus all that needs to be shown
is that
preserves the operation. Now
,
recalling the definition of
, so
Consequently, we have
.
We have thus established the fundamental result stated
below.
We note that the significance of this theorem
is that it relates two seemingly unrelated concepts, i.e.,
concepts of factor group and homomorphic image.
In particular, the FHT basically says that these two
concepts coincide.
Example 7.1.9
Let

defined by

.
It is not hard to verify that

is a homomorphism
of

onto

.
![$Ker(f) = \{0,[3]\}$](img1575.gif)
is the subgroup of

generated by
![$[3]$](img1576.gif)
,
i.e.,
![$\langle [3] \rangle$](img1577.gif)
.
(Here
![$[a]$](img107.gif)
is in the notation of Exercise # 4 in
§
4.3.)
FHT implies
![$\mathbb {Z}_6/\langle [3] \rangle \cong \mathbb {Z}_3$](img1578.gif)
.
We note that this example could also have been
given as follows:
Let

defined by

for any

.
The reader should verify again that this
is a homomorphism, find its kernel and state the
conclusion of FHT in this case.

Subsections
Next: Exercises
Up: Homomorphisms
Previous: Homomorphisms
  Contents
  Index
David Joyner
2001-04-12