|
Excellent:
|
Consistently went above and beyond their share of
the project. For example, they may have tutored their team mates or went
well beyond what was expected of them.
(Note: this rating can only be applied to one
member of a team, and comments must be included below.)
|
| Very Good: |
Always did their assignments. Always very well prepared and cooperative.
Always at team meetings. |
| Good: |
(Note: this is the standard category for
a group member with no significant plusses or minuses.)
The team member consistently did what they were
supposed to do. Acceptably prepared and cooperative.
Attended almost all meetings, and had good excuses
for those missed. |
|
Satisfactory:
|
Usually did what they were supposed to. Minimally
prepared and cooperative.
|
|
Marginal:
|
Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments
with only lame excuses. Prepared about half the time. Other teammates had
to complete some of their assignments on rare occasions.
|
|
Deficient
|
Often failed to show up or complete assignments.
Usually unprepared and uncooperative. Required extra work by teammates.
(Comments are required.)
|
|
Unsatisfactory:
|
Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments,
unprepared and uncooperative most of the time. (Comments are required.)
|
|
Superficial:
|
Practically no participation. (Comments are required.)
|
|
No show:
|
No participation at all. (Comments are required.)
|