About the Presenter:
|
|
Professor Peter Guth (PhD, MIT) teaches oceanography, including geology and GIS, at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis. Dr. Guth’s publications include over 30 peer-reviewed journal papers and book chapters. His research interests include geomorphometry from digital elevation models, algorithms using digital elevation models, and innovative uses of GIS in archaeology including the Battle of Big Hole (1877), 3D artefact distributions on the Swedish warship Vasa, and the search for the Bonhomme Richard. |
Lesson Objectives:
Discuss what GIS can accomplish, and the terms vector data, raster data, and metadata.
Discuss the uses of digital topography in determining visibility between the ships and the land.
Discuss the use of drift models to map the possible motion of the Bonhomme Richard before it sank.
INTRODUCTION
Lesson Introduction--Click for WMV video clip.
We have used Geographic information systems (GIS) in several ways in the search for the Bonhomme Richard:
In this lesson we will look at the principles of GIS and digital data, and see some applications as applied to evaluating the historical record of the final days of the Bonhomme Richard. We will also look at some basic oceanography, and see how tides, winds, and currents might be incorporated into the GIS to model the drift of the ship.
GIS merges maps and databases, and has wide applications in the earth sciences, land use planning, and military operations. GIS allows searching for spatial patterns and data visualization, and can be applied to historical studies. Data layers provide the key feature of GIS, allowing integration of multiple data sets, and rapidly changing the display to reveal patterns and relationships. Properly registered data, with geographic positions assigned, and standard data formats allow users to select from a wide variety of software. At its core, GIS combines a computer database with a map display, and allows the user to go back and forth between the two.
Google Earth provides many aspects of a GIS in a simple to
use package that is free for personal use, and comes with free data
streaming over the internet. A wide variety of additional data sets,
produced by government agencies and individuals, exist in the KML/KMZ format
used by Google Earth. If you do not have Google Earth on your
computer, you should
download and install it now.
You should now download several data sets related to the search for the Bonhomme Richard, and look at them in Google Earth. You should click on the links for each of the data sets, and if you have Google Earth installed, they should open automatically. The discussion forum and quiz will both assume you have looked at these data sets.
Table 1. Data sets available as KMZ files for student use.
The SRTM data allows Google Earth and other software to show 3D visualizations. For much of the world SRTM is the only data, and in other regions the only free data. It has elevations values every three arc seconds (about 90 m), which is good for many studies. Image: P. Guth |
|
Image: P. Guth |
|
Image: P. Guth |
|
|
|
Image: P. Reaveley |
![]() |
|
Image: Google Earth, displaying data from P. Guth |
| Figure 2. One of the key strengths of GIS is the ability to go
from a database to the map and back. In you click on any of the
symbols on the Google Earth map, you will see the full record for that
point. As shown in the table, you can see the conditions used for that
particular simulation including the time, ship speed, tides, winds, and
the course made good. When you find the wreck, you will be able to
get directions on how to get there.
Image: Google Earth, displaying data from P. Guth |
![]() |
| Figure 3. Unlike a full GIS, Google Earth lacks a few
capabilities that can greatly enhance analysis. In the map to the
left, the colors indicate the hourly speeds of the Bonhomme Richard
for one of the simulations. The ship was sailing at 2 knots
eastward, but the tide changes both the speed and the direction. In addition, a GIS allows the
database to be filtered, and only records matching the user's criteria
will be displayed.
Despite these limitations, Google Earth makes an ideal display mechanism for the display of GIS analysis, and results can be easily disseminated--with luck, each student has been looking at the data. Image: P. Guth |
SRTM and DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHY One of the best "tricks" in Google Earth is its ability to show a three dimensional view of terrain. This requires digital topography, most often supplied as a digital elevation model (DEM). The most commonly used DEM is from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), which flew on space shuttle Endeavor during a 10 day mission in 2000. SRTM is an international project led by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Data covers most of the earth's land area (it could not cover Antarctica or the higher northern latitudes) with a spatial resolution of 3 arc seconds (about 90 m), and this data is freely available for downloading on the internet. In developed parts of the world higher resolution elevation data is available. Much of the US has 1 m data, such as that was used for this>
We have used the SRTM topography to calculate the locations from which Serapis and Bonhomme Richard could see the cliffs at Flambouough Head on the British coast. Because intervisibility is reciprocal, these are the same locations from which observers on land could see the ships. The computations consider earth curvature, and we have repeated the calculations for various heights above the sea surface--sailing ships would send lookouts into the ship's rigging because of the increased distances they could see. The computations can be done as profiles showing the intervisibility, as perspective views of what a person would see at a location, or as maps (called viewsheds or weapons fans) showing visible and masked terrain. The military uses these for direct fire weapons, radios, and radars which all require line of sight; civilian uses include cell phone tower coverage, or preserving the environment in parks and other areas threatened with development. We mentioned in the navigation lesson that ship's officers had rules of thumb to estimate visibility, but with the GIS we can account for the added range with the 130 m tall cliffs
![]() |
Figure 4. View of the cliffs at Flamborough Head from the presumed location of
the Serapis and Bonhomme
Richard at 1500 on Friday 24 September 1779. This view considers
the curvature of the earth, and contains significant vertical
exaggeration. The point considered is 10 m above the sea surface. Image: P. Guth using SRTM data |
|
Figure 5.
Locations that can see the cliffs at Flamborough Head from locations 5 m
(red), 10 m (yellow), and 15 m (green) above the sea surface, which
correspond to different locations on a ship and its rigging.
Conversely, someone along the cliffs can see that portion of a ship
higher than 5, 10, or 15 m. Image: P. Guth using SRTM data |
![]() |
The tides respond to the gravitational attractions between the sun and earth and the moon and earth. Most places have two high and two low tides a day (the actual periods are a little over 24 hours). Spring tides, with larger tidal ranges, occur with the new moon and full moon. The tidal range off Flamborough Head in the North Sea is about 5 m, but away from land the vertical tide motion decreases and has minor impact on most things. The tidal currents required to move water horizontally will increase as the tidal range increases. The currents will approach zero at slack water at both low and high tides, and reach a maximum in the middle of the cycle. There will be four peak currents daily, approximately every 6 hours, and 4 minimums when the tidal currents approach zero.
Tidal currents in the North Sea can have speeds exceeding 2 knots, which according to the logbooks is as fast as the Serapis moved in the days immediately following the sinking of Bonhomme Richard. We have tidal hindcasts from the High Resolution UKCS Model: Surface Currents (CS20-15HC_S), Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory. The tidal current predictions cover the region show in Figure 6 for a three day period from 1800 Thursday to 1800 Sunday, which covers the period of the battle until after the sinking of the Bonhomme Richard and the Serapis moving away eastward. The North Sea has diurnal tides with a period a little over 12 hours, and consequently the tidal currents have about 4 maximums and 4 minimums per day (Figure 7; the hourly computations do not capture the zero velocity when the tide actually reverses). Maximum current velocities were increasing during this time period of the battle and its aftermath, with the full moon on Saturday 25 September and the maximum spring tides two days later. We use the Proudman estimates at the 4 nearest points to perform a bilinear interpolation to estimate tide currents at any location shown in Figure 8 for our drift models. Using a time step of 1 hour, to match the tidal predictions, we do not have to do any time interpolations.
|
Figure 6. Tide predictions for N54°10.498' E0° 0.750' in late September 1779. Image: P.Guth using Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory data |
|
Figure 7. Predicted tidal currents for N54°10.498' E0° 0.750' in late September 1779. Image: P.Guth using Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory data |
| Figure 8. Animation showing the tidal currents off Flamborough Head in late
September 1779. The vectors show the predicted direction and
magnitude of the tidal current at hourly intervals. Note that the
tide is not at the same phase everywhere in this map area at the same
time, and that the maximum speeds also vary with location.
Image: P.Guth using Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory data |
Drifting Bodies and Ship Motions
We have tried to model the motion of three things for what they can tell us about the sinking of the Bonhomme Richard:
A drifting body will respond to motions from the tides, and from wind induced currents. If the crew is actively sailing a ship, there will be a third motion caused by the force of the wind exerted on the sails. The tidal current will generally move back and forth, and is the simplest and easiest component on the historical BHR scenario to compute. The wind induced current will show a lag with the initiation of the wind, and will be at an angle from the direction of the wind due to the Coriolis deflection. The speed and direction of the wind current will depend on the latitude, the depth at which the current is measured, and the wind speed. The sailing rule of thumb (2% of the wind speed after 12 hours of steady wind, about 15º to the right of the wind in shallow coastal waters in the northern hemisphere) is harder to apply because the wind was changing during the time period of the Bonhomme Richard motion.
Because we have no direct information about the speed and heading of the Bonhomme Richard, we have not tried to separate the wind-induced current from whatever motion they might have gotten as they tried to sail the ship. We will cover the battle and its aftermath later in the course, but for now you should realize that masts, sails, and rigging had all suffered extensive damage, and both ships had significant damage to the hulls which caused the Bonhomme Richard to sink. We enter values for the model (Table 2) with a starting location and a speed and direction for each hour, and like a spreadsheet, the GIS computes the other values in the table and plots the positions on a map (Figure 3).
Table 2. Drift models (Sym_1). Bold values in red are inputs to the model, and the other values are computed.
| LAT | LONG | NAME | SHIP_DIR | SHIP_SPEED | TIDE_DIR | TIDE_SPEED | CMG_SPEED | CMG_DIR |
| 54.1666667 | 0.0833333 | Fri 1500 | 90 | 2 | 155 | 1.76 | 3.17 | 120.2 |
| 54.1401168 | 0.1609517 | Fri 1600 | 90 | 2 | 159 | 1.63 | 3 | 120.4 |
| 54.1148335 | 0.2342313 | Fri 1700 | 90 | 2 | 159 | 1.19 | 2.68 | 114.46 |
| 54.0963752 | 0.3031991 | Fri 1800 | 90 | 2 | 150 | 0.57 | 2.34 | 102.29 |
| 54.0880849 | 0.3678099 | Fri 1900 | 90 | 2 | 32 | 0.23 | 2.13 | 84.78 |
| 54.09129 | 0.4278226 | Fri 2000 | 90 | 2 | 356 | 0.78 | 2.09 | 68.1 |
| 54.1042621 | 0.4827875 | Fri 2100 | 90 | 2 | 348 | 1.17 | 2.1 | 57.03 |
| 54.1232388 | 0.5326226 | Fri 2200 | 90 | 2 | 342 | 1.28 | 2.01 | 52.76 |
| 54.143465 | 0.5779576 | Fri 2300 | 90 | 2 | 335 | 1.12 | 1.83 | 56.2 |
| 54.1603576 | 0.6209806 | Fri 2400 | 90 | 2 | 323 | 0.69 | 1.67 | 70.74 |
| 54.1695345 | 0.6657916 | Sat 0100 | 90 | 2 | 255 | 0.24 | 1.77 | 91.98 |
| 54.1685083 | 0.7159007 | Sat 0200 | 90 | 2 | 176 | 0.67 | 2.16 | 108.11 |
| 54.1573462 | 0.7739765 | Sat 0300 | 90 | 2 | 163 | 1.14 | 2.57 | 114.99 |
| 54.1392417 | 0.8400513 | Sat 0400 | 90 | 2 | 156 | 1.28 | 2.78 | 114.87 |
| 54.119777 | 0.9114672 | Sat 0500 | 90 | 2 | 147 | 1.16 | 2.81 | 110.39 |
| 54.1034845 | 0.9859583 | Sat 0600 | 90 | 2 | 133 | 0.89 | 2.73 | 102.93 |
| 54.0933156 | 1.0611604 | Sat 0700 | 90 | 2 | 112 | 0.62 | 2.59 | 95.27 |
| 54.0893387 | 1.134101 | Sat 0800 | 90 | 2 | 105 | 0.5 | 2.49 | 92.97 |
| 54.0871652 | 1.2045646 | Sat 0900 | 90 | 2 | 120 | 0.59 | 2.52 | 96.75 |
| 54.0822102 | 1.2755041 | Sat 1000 | 90 | 2 | 135 | 0.98 | 2.78 | 104.27 |
| 54.0521511 | 1.4337701 | Sat 1100 | 90 | 2 | 141 | 1.43 | 3.11 | 111.08 |
We have done 5 simulations (Table 3) which we think represent end members, with maximum and minimum probable velocities. Taken together they define a maximum likely search region.
Table 3. Five simulations presented at the 2009 USNA Naval History Symposium
| Sym_1 | Bonhomme Richard sails due east (90˚ true) with a speed of 2 knots. Given the wind conditions, this is probably the extreme heading they could have achieved, and the fastest speed given the condition of the ships and the need to transfer men and supplies among ships in the squadron. This is the speed and heading of the Serapis when the log resumes at 1300 Saturday, adjusted for the difference between magnetic north and true north, and reflects that fact the ship actually did sail generally eastward to safety. |
| Sym_2 | Bonhomme Richard sails due northeasterly with a heading of 30˚ true with a speed of 2 knots. This assumes the validity of comments from British observers, attributing the ships as heading toward Scandinavia. |
| Sym_3 | Bonhomme Richard had no headway and drifted with the tides. Because of the time period involved, this simulation sinks only about 1.7 nautical miles from the starting location, although it had drifted about 5.5 nautical miles. Given the assumed starting location, this would be the closest the ship could be to land. |
| Sym_4 | Bonhomme Richard's heading is 50˚true, intermediate between Sym_1 and Sym_2. It sails at 1 knot on Friday, and 2 knots Saturday. This might be appropriate if damage control done Friday allowed John Paul Jones to increase speed on Saturday. |
| Sym_5 | Like Sym_4,Bonhomme Richard's heading is 50˚true. It sails at 2 knots on Friday, and 1 knot Saturday. This might be appropriate if John Paul Jones recognized the inevitable and slowed down to transfer as many men and supplies as possible from the Bonhomme Richard before it sank. |
Besides our use in looking for the Bonhomme Richard, similiar models are used to model the dispersion of oil slicks, or to guide search and rescue efforts for lost boaters. One of the most "interesting" studies of drifting with the currents was conducted by oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer who studied the differences between rubber ducky bath toys and brand-name running shoes. These behave quite differently--the toys stick up and catch the wind, and move with the very surface layer of the water, while the neutrally buoyant shoes move with a deeper water layer, and have a greater Coriolis deflection from the wind direction. Besides being a fun story, this emphasizes that the drift of the Serapis mast, probably not sticking much above the water line or extending very far below, might be very different than the ship, whether or not the crew was actively trying to sail.
Conclusions
GIS is a powerful tool, both for research and the dissemination of results. GIS does for mapping what the spreadsheets did for computation--lets you rapidly and easily change parameters, and graphically see the results. Our models give us insight into the main questions which we need to take back to the historical record, of which I will mention probably the two most important:
The answers to these questions in large part determine which of our simulations is most nearly correct, and where the search effort should next focus.
Lesson summary--Click for WMV video clip.
Go to
USNA Blackboard
for this
week's discussion and quiz.
References:
Anne Kelly Knowles, ed., Placing history : how maps, spatial data, and GIS are changing historical scholarship (Redlands, California: ESRI Press, 2008), 313 p.
Anne Kelly Knowles, ed., Past time, past place : GIS for history (Redlands, California: ESRI Press, 2002) 202 p.
John S. Barnes, editor, The Logs of the Serapis--Alliance--Ariel under the Command of John Paul Jones (New York: Naval History Society), 138.
Guth, P. "Track the sinking ship: GIS and ocean modeling in the search for the Bonhomme Richard." United States Naval Academy Naval History Symposium, 2009.
Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, "Applications Team," http://www.pol.ac.uk/appl/, Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory (accessed August 31, 2009).
Last revision 3/1/2012