a. write the theorem statement in first order logic (you may treat $x$ and $y$ as constants, i.e. you do not need "$\forall x,y$")
b. prove in step-by-step first-order logic style that the assumption "that x*y = 0 and both x and y are nonzero" really is the logical negation of the theorem statement.Your job For the inductive part of the proof: Circle and label the base case. Circle and label the inductive case. Clearly identify where the inductive hypothesis is applied.
Hopefully you can follow along with that theorem and make sense of it, even some lines of the proof actually stand for many lines if we were to write it out "step-by-step". Your job is to write out the "step-by-step" version of line c.3. I've done c.1 and c.2 for you to demonstrate what I mean.
| c.1 | 0: 1 < 0 [Assumption A] |
| c.2 | 1: ∀x[x < 0 => 0 < -x] [Negation and Order Theorem] 2: 1 < 0 => 0 < -1 [Specialize x to 1 in line 1] 3: 0 < -1 [Modus ponens on 2 and 1] | c.3 |
____________________________________________________________________________________________________Fill in with your point-by-point proof of step c.3. |